Shloka 17
Adhyaya 75 — The Fall and Restoration of Revatī Nakṣatra and the Birth of Raivata Manu
सोऽयं किमात्मदोषेण मम दोषेण वा मुने ।
अस्मद्दुःखवहो जातो दौःशील्याद् बन्धुशोकदः ॥
so 'yaṃ kim ātmadoṣeṇa mama doṣeṇa vā mune /
asmad-duḥkhavaho jāto dauḥśīlyād bandhu-śokadaḥ
Kaya nga, O pantas, ang anak bang ito’y isinilang dahil sa sariling kasalanan niya, o dahil sa kasalanan ko—siya na naging tagapagdala ng dalamhati sa amin, at sa masamang asal ay nagdulot ng pighati sa aming mga kamag-anak?
{ "primaryRasa": "karuna", "secondaryRasa": "shanta", "rasaIntensity": 0, "emotionalArcPosition": "", "moodDescriptors": [] }
FAQs
The verse articulates a classic dharma-question: moral responsibility vs. inherited/parental causality. It pushes the inquiry beyond ritual correctness into character formation and karmic entanglement.
Ethical-philosophical dialogue (dharma-vicāra), outside pancalakṣaṇa categories.
The ‘fault’ dilemma mirrors the guṇa theory: tamasic tendencies may arise from prior saṃskāras (past impressions), challenging simplistic blame and urging compassionate discernment.