Adhyaya 37 — Alarka’s Crisis and the Teaching on Non-Attachment (Madālasa’s Instruction Recalled)
न्यूूनातिरिक्ततां याति पञ्चकेऽस्मिन् सुखासुखम् ।
यदि स्यान्म किन्न स्यादन्यस्थेऽपि हि तन्मयि ॥
nyūnātiriktatāṃ yāti pañcake ’smin sukhāsukham | yadi syān ma kin na syād anyasthe ’pi hi tan-mayi ||
Ang ligaya at sakit ay nasusumpungan bilang kakulangan o kalabisan sa limang-bahaging kalipunan (ang kabuuang katawan). Kung tunay ngang sa akin iyon, bakit hindi rin iyon umiiral para sa akin kahit ako’y nananahan sa ibang dako, hiwalay dito, gayong ako’y may likas na kamalayang iyon?
{ "primaryRasa": "shanta", "secondaryRasa": "jnana", "rasaIntensity": 0, "emotionalArcPosition": "", "moodDescriptors": [] }
Pleasure and pain fluctuate due to conditions in the embodied complex; therefore one should not claim them as the Self. Ethically, this supports equanimity and reduced attachment/aversion.
Not a pañcalakṣaṇa topic (sarga/pratisarga/vaṃśa/manvantara/vaṃśānucarita); it belongs to upadeśa (instruction) embedded in narrative dialogue.
‘Deficiency/excess’ hints that sukha-duḥkha are measurable modifications (vikāra) of the kośa-complex; the witnessing Self is non-quantifiable and thus not their locus.