Shloka 496
Kṛṣṇa at Duryodhana’s House: Refusal of Hospitality and Departure to Vidura (कृष्णस्य धार्तराष्ट्रनिवेशनगमनम्)
न मे दुःखतरं किंचिद् भूतपूर्व ततो5धिकम् । 'युधिष्ठिर
na me duḥkhataraṃ kiñcid bhūtapūrva tato 'dhikam | yudhiṣṭhira-bhīma-arjuna-nakula-sahadevān api me na draupadyāḥ adhikatarāḥ priyāḥ | sā draupadīṃ mayā bhari sabhāyāṃ ānītāṃ dṛṣṭvā, tasmād adhikaṃ mahad duḥkhaṃ me pūrvaṃ kadācana nābhavat ||
Sinabi ni Vaiśampāyana: “Wala nang higit na masakit pa roon ang nangyari sa akin—wala nang hihigit pang dalamhati. Maging sina Yudhiṣṭhira, Bhīma, Arjuna, Nakula, at Sahadeva ay hindi ko minamahal nang higit kaysa kay Draupadī. Nang makita ko ang mismong Draupadī na kinaladkad papasok sa harap ng punong kapulungan, dumanas ako ng pighating higit sa anumang naranasan ko noon.”
वैशम्पायन उवाच
Educational Q&A
The verse underscores the ethical shock of public humiliation: violating a woman’s dignity in a royal assembly is portrayed as a supreme cause of grief and a sign of adharma. It also highlights steadfast loyalty—Draupadī’s worth and honor are held as precious as, or more than, even the greatest heroes.
Vaiśaṃpāyana recalls the traumatic moment when Draupadī was brought into the crowded court. He states that no earlier sorrow matched the pain of witnessing her public disgrace, emphasizing how deeply that event wounded the moral order and the hearts of those who revered her.