Shloka 20
Prāyaścitta-vidhāna: Tapas, Dāna, Vrata, and Proportional Expiation (प्रायश्चित्तविधानम्)
दश वा वेदशास्त्रज्ञास्त्रयो वा धर्मपाठका: । यद् ब्रूयु: कार्य उत्पन्ने स धर्मो धर्मसंशये
daśa vā vedaśāstrajñās trayo vā dharmapāṭhakāḥ | yad brūyuḥ kārya utpanne sa dharmo dharmasaṃśaye ||
Wika ni Vyāsa: Kapag may isang usaping lumitaw at nagkaroon ng pag-aalinlangan kung alin ang tunay na dharma—lalo na sa mga bagay na nangangailangan ng pagtubos—dapat tanggapin bilang dharma ang anumang pasyang nabuo matapos pagtalakayan ng sampung Brāhmaṇa na bihasa sa Veda at mga śāstra, o ng tatlong palagiang nag-aaral at sumusuri sa dharma.
व्यास उवाच
Educational Q&A
When dharma is uncertain in a real-life situation—especially regarding expiation—one should rely on a qualified collective judgment: either ten experts in Veda and śāstra, or three dedicated specialists in dharma-study. Their considered verdict is to be treated as dharma for that case.
In the Śānti Parva’s instruction on righteous conduct, Vyāsa lays down a practical rule for resolving moral-legal ambiguity: when texts or circumstances leave doubt, consult a competent council of learned Brāhmaṇas and accept their deliberated decision as the applicable dharma.