धृतराष्ट्राश्रमगमनम् — The Pandavas’ Procession to Dhritarashtra’s Hermitage
दुर्योधनको कलियुग समझो और शकुनिको द्वापर। शुभदर्शने! अपने दुःशासन आदि पुत्रोंकोी राक्षस जानो ।।
duryodhanaḥ kali-yugaḥ samākhyeyaḥ śakuniś ca dvāparaḥ | śubha-darśane! duḥśāsanādīn putrān rākṣasān jānīhi || marud-gaṇād bhīmasenaṃ balavantaṃ ariṃdamam | viddhi tvaṃ tu nara-ṛṣim imaṃ pārthaṃ dhanaṃjayam ||
Wika ni Vyāsa: “O ikaw na may mapalad na paningin, unawain mong si Duryodhana ang sagisag ng Panahong Kali, at si Śakuni ang sa Panahong Dvāpara. Alamin mong si Duḥśāsana at ang iba pang mga anak ay may likas na rākṣasa. Kilalanin mo si Bhīmasena na makapangyarihan, tagadurog ng mga kaaway, na isinilang mula sa isang bahagi ng mga Marut; at alamin mong ang Pārtha na si Dhanaṃjaya ay ang sinaunang rishi na si Nara.”
व्यास उवाच
Vyāsa frames the characters as moral-cosmic types: Duryodhana embodies Kali-like decline, Śakuni reflects Dvāpara-like contentiousness, while the Pāṇḍavas are linked to divine/ṛṣi origins. The ethical point is that adharma is not merely personal but can manifest as a larger degenerative force, whereas dharmic strength is grounded in higher, disciplined sources.
In Āśramavāsika Parva, Vyāsa instructs the addressed listener (here called ‘Śubhadarśanā’) to understand the inner nature and origins of key figures: the Kauravas are characterized as rākṣasa-like and aligned with dark yuga qualities, while Bhīma and Arjuna are identified with divine/ṛṣi lineages (Maruts and Nara), explaining their extraordinary power and role in the war’s moral arc.