Shloka 32
दैव–पुरुषकार-प्रश्नः
Daiva–Puruṣakāra Inquiry: Fate and Human Effort
अश्वमेधादिभिर्यज्ञै: सत्कृत: कोसलाधिप: । महर्षिशापात् सौदास: पुरुषादत्वमागत:
aśvamedhādibhir yajñaiḥ satkṛtaḥ kosalādhipaḥ | maharṣiśāpāt saudāsaḥ puruṣādatvam āgataḥ ||
Wika ni Bhishma: “(Ngayon, magbibigay ako ng kabaligtarang halimbawa.) Kahit pinarangalan sa pamamagitan ng mga handog na gaya ng Aśvamedha, ang pinuno ng Kosala na si Saudāsa ay, dahil sa sumpa ng isang dakilang rishi, bumagsak sa kalagayan ng isang halimaw na kumakain ng tao. Ipinakikita nito na ang panlabas na kabanalan at dangal ay hindi panangga kapag nasuway ang mga banal.”
भीष्म उवाच
Educational Q&A
Ritual merit and royal prestige (even from great sacrifices like the Aśvamedha) cannot override the moral and karmic consequences of grave wrongdoing—especially offenses against great sages. Dharma requires inner restraint, humility, and reverence toward the righteous, not merely external piety.
Bhishma cites Saudāsa, the king of Kosala, as an illustrative example: despite being honored through major sacrifices, he became a man-eating being due to a maharshi’s curse (understood in tradition as Vasiṣṭha’s). The example is offered as a contrasting case (viparīta dṛṣṭānta) to emphasize the power of ethical transgression and the weight of a sage’s curse.