Dāyavibhāga (Inheritance Apportionment) and Household Precedence — Dialogue of Yudhiṣṭhira and Bhīṣma
न हाकामेन संवासं मनुरेवं प्रशंसति । अयशस्यथमधर्म्य च यन्मृषा धर्मकोपनम्
na hākāmena saṃvāsaṃ manur evaṃ praśaṃsati | ayaśasyam adharmyaṃ ca yan mṛṣā dharmakopanam ||
Wika ni Bhishma: “Hindi sinasang-ayunan ni Manu ang pagsasamang hindi ninanais ng kapwa panig. Kaya ang pagtatangkang gawing walang-bisa ang kasal na napagkasunduan ng lahat ay sanhi ng kahihiyan at kawalang-dharma; itinuturing itong gawaing sumisira sa dharma mismo.”
भीष्म उवाच
Cohabitation and marital union should not be forced or one-sided; attempting to overturn a mutually settled marriage is condemned as disgraceful and adharmic, because it destabilizes the moral-legal order (dharma).
In Bhīṣma’s instruction on dharma (Anuśāsana Parva), he cites Manu’s authority to frame a rule of ethical conduct regarding marriage: lack of consent and attempts to nullify a socially agreed marriage are treated as violations that damage dharma.