Shloka 4
Vipula’s Guru-Obedience, Divine Flowers, and the Peril of Others’ Oaths (विपुलोपाख्यानम्—पुष्पप्राप्तिः शपथ-प्रसङ्गश्च)
इति ता: पुरुषव्यापत्र कथं शक््यास्तु रक्षितुम् । प्रमदा: पुरुषेणेह तन्मे व्याख्यातुमहसि
iti tāḥ puruṣavyāpatra kathaṁ śakyāstu rakṣitum | pramadāḥ puruṣeṇeha tan me vyākhyātum arhasi ||
Sinabi ni Yudhiṣṭhira: “Kung ang mga babae ay ganito nalalantad sa mga panganib na nagmumula sa mga lalaki, paano sila tunay na mapangangalagaan ng isang lalaki sa mundong ito? Ipaliwanag mo ito sa akin.”
युधिछिर उवाच
Educational Q&A
The verse frames an ethical dilemma: if the very agent expected to protect (a man, or male guardianship) can also be a source of danger, then protection must be understood as a dharmic system—self-restraint, social norms, and responsibility—rather than mere physical control.
Yudhiṣṭhira, continuing a dharma inquiry in Anuśāsana Parva, asks for clarification on how women can be safeguarded when men themselves may cause harm, requesting the elder’s authoritative explanation.