Indra–Mataṅga Saṃvāda: On the rarity and responsibilities of Brāhmaṇya (इन्द्र-मतङ्ग संवादः)
तत्र तीव्र व्रणं दृष्ट॒वा गर्दभी पुत्रगृद्धिनी । उवाच मा शुच: पुत्र चाण्डालस्त्वधितिष्ठति
tatra tīvra-vraṇaṁ dṛṣṭvā gardabhī putra-gṛddhinī | uvāca mā śucaḥ putra cāṇḍālas tv adhitiṣṭhati ||
Nang makita roon ang isang matinding sugat, nagsalita ang babaeng asno—sabik sa kanyang bisiro—: “Huwag kang magdalamhati, anak; may isang Caṇḍāla na nagbabantay at umaalalay sa iyo (nakatayo sa iyong tabi).”
भीष्म उवाच
Even amid pain and fear, reassurance and care are central ethical responses; the verse also reveals how social labels (like “Caṇḍāla”) are invoked in the narrative world, shaping perceptions of who is seen as a caregiver or attendant.
A she-donkey, anxious for her young, sees a grievous wound and speaks to her child, telling it not to grieve because a Caṇḍāla is present/attending—indicating someone is standing by to look after the injured one.