Sati's Death & Virabhadra — Sati’s Death and the Assault on Daksha’s Sacrifice: Virabhadra versus the Devas
खड्गचर्मगदाप्रासपरश्वधवराङ्कुशैः चापमार्गणभृत्तस्थौ हन्तुकामो गणेश्वरम्
khaḍgacarmagadāprāsaparaśvadhavarāṅkuśaiḥ cāpamārgaṇabhṛttasthau hantukāmo gaṇeśvaram
เขาสวมศัสตราวุธคือดาบและโล่ กระบอง หอก ขวาน และตะขอช้างอันประเสริฐ พร้อมทั้งยืนประจำด้วยคันธนูและศร ปรารถนาจะสังหารคเณศวร
{ "primaryRasa": "raudra", "secondaryRasa": "vira", "rasaIntensity": 0, "emotionalArcPosition": "", "moodDescriptors": [] }
Aggression toward a dharmic/divine protector (here Gaṇeśvara) is portrayed as adharma; the verse foregrounds intent (hantukāma) as ethically weighty—violent intention itself is a moral fault that precipitates conflict and its consequences.
This is best classified under Vamśānucarita/Carita-type narrative material (accounts of deeds and events involving divine beings), rather than cosmogenesis (sarga/pratisarga) or manvantara cataloguing.
The piling up of weapons symbolizes the escalation of egoic force against divine order; Gaṇeśa, as the lord of gaṇas and remover of obstacles, becomes the ‘obstacle’ to adharmic intent—hence conflict arises where dharma blocks unrighteous aims.