Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 30

सीताहरण

विलापः / The Lament at Jatāyu and the Abduction of Sītā

तरुप्रवालरक्ता सा नीलाङ्गं राक्षसेश्वरम्।प्राशोभयत वैदेही गजं कक्ष्येव काञ्चनी।।।।

taru-pravāla-raktā sā nīlāṅgaṃ rākṣaseśvaram |

prāśobhayata vaidehī gajaṃ kakṣyeva kāñcanī ||

ไวเทหีผู้แดงเรื่อดุจยอดอ่อนแห่งพฤกษา ทำให้จอมราชาแห่งรากษสผู้กายสีคล้ำดูประดับงดงาม ราวกับโซ่ทองสำหรับล่ามช้างที่คล้องอยู่บนกายช้าง

तरुप्रवालरक्ताreddish like tender shoots
तरुप्रवालरक्ता:
Viśeṣaṇa (विशेषण)
TypeAdjective
Rootतरु + प्रवाल + रक्त (प्रातिपदिक)
Formतत्पुरुष (upamā/viśeṣaṇa sense: taru-pravāla-sadṛśa-raktā), स्त्रीलिङ्ग, प्रथमा, एकवचन; विशेषण to सा/वैदेही
साshe
सा:
Karta (कर्ता)
TypeNoun
Rootतद् (सर्वनाम-प्रातिपदिक)
Formस्त्रीलिङ्ग, प्रथमा, एकवचन; सर्वनाम (pronoun)
नीलाङ्गम्dark-bodied
नीलाङ्गम्:
Viśeṣaṇa (विशेषण)
TypeAdjective
Rootनील + अङ्ग (प्रातिपदिक)
Formकर्मधारय (nīlam aṅgam yasya), पुंलिङ्ग, द्वितीया, एकवचन; विशेषण to राक्षसेश्वरम्
राक्षसेश्वरम्lord of the rākṣasas (Rāvaṇa)
राक्षसेश्वरम्:
Karma (कर्म)
TypeNoun
Rootराक्षस + ईश्वर (प्रातिपदिक)
Formषष्ठी-तत्पुरुष (rākṣasānām īśvaraḥ), पुंलिङ्ग, द्वितीया, एकवचन
प्राशोभयतmade (him) shine/adorned
प्राशोभयत:
Kriyā (क्रिया)
TypeVerb
Root√शुभ्/शोभ् (धातु) (णिच् causative)
Formलङ् (Imperfect), परस्मैपदम्, प्रथमपुरुष, एकवचन; णिच् (causative)
वैदेहीVaidehī (Sītā)
वैदेही:
Karta (कर्ता)
TypeNoun
Rootवैदेही (प्रातिपदिक)
Formस्त्रीलिङ्ग, प्रथमा, एकवचन; apposition to सा
गजम्an elephant
गजम्:
Upamāna (उपमान)
TypeNoun
Rootगज (प्रातिपदिक)
Formपुंलिङ्ग, द्वितीया, एकवचन
कक्ष्याa girth/band
कक्ष्या:
Upamāna (उपमान)
TypeNoun
Rootकक्ष्या (प्रातिपदिक)
Formस्त्रीलिङ्ग, प्रथमा, एकवचन
इवlike
इव:
Upamā-dyotaka (उपमा-द्योतक)
TypeIndeclinable
Rootइव (अव्यय)
Formउपमा-अव्यय
काञ्चनीa golden (band)
काञ्चनी:
Upamāna (उपमान)
TypeNoun
Rootकाञ्चनी (प्रातिपदिक)
Formस्त्रीलिङ्ग, प्रथमा, एकवचन

With her golden girdle, Sita whose complexion resembled tender leaves looked like a golden chain to bind an elephant with. (Here Ravana is the elephant).

V
Vaidehī (Sītā)
R
Rāvaṇa (rākṣaseśvara)
G
gaja (elephant) (simile)

FAQs

The verse contrasts outer splendor with inner unrighteousness: adornment can mask adharma, but does not sanctify it—an ethical warning against confusing beauty or power with virtue.

While Rāvaṇa carries Sītā, the poet describes the visual contrast between Sītā’s radiance and Rāvaṇa’s dark form through a striking simile.

Sītā’s innate dignity and radiance (tejas) remain intact even in violation, underscoring moral purity amid coercion.