Shloka 56
Slaying of Andhaka; Hymn to the Sun; Glory of Brahmins; Gayatri Nyasa and Pranayama
येनार्चयंति सततं भवतोर्च्यमर्चिस्तेर्चिष्प्रतापितदिगंबरवित्तहीनाः । क्षुत्क्षामकंठजठराघटखर्परेण भिक्षामटंति परवेश्मसुतेर्थहीनाः
yenārcayaṃti satataṃ bhavatorcyamarcisterciṣpratāpitadigaṃbaravittahīnāḥ | kṣutkṣāmakaṃṭhajaṭharāghaṭakharpareṇa bhikṣāmaṭaṃti paraveśmasuterthahīnāḥ
ผู้ใดบูชาพระผู้ควรบูชานั้นอยู่เสมอด้วยเพียง (แค่) เปลวไฟนั้น ครั้นถูกความร้อนแผดเผา ก็กลายเป็นผู้เปลือยกายและยากไร้ ด้วยความหิวคอและท้องร่อยหรอ ถือเพียงหม้อและบาตรขอทาน ก็พเนจรขอทานตามเรือนผู้อื่น ปราศจากที่พึ่งอันศักดิ์สิทธิ์อันแท้จริง
Unspecified in the provided excerpt (context needed from Adhyaya 46 framing dialogue).
Concept: External worship or austerity, when reduced to a mere ‘flame’ (a token act) without right knowledge, right refuge, and integrated dharma, can lead to spiritual and material ruin.
Application: Avoid performative spirituality; pair worship with ethical livelihood, humility, and guidance from śāstra and guru; ensure practices nourish compassion rather than self-harm or pride.
Primary Rasa: karuna
Secondary Rasa: bibhatsa
Type: city
Visual Art Cues: {"scene_description":"A stark roadside scene: an emaciated ascetic, scorched by the heat of a small flame he clings to as ‘worship,’ walks barefoot with a cracked pot and begging bowl. Behind him loom indifferent houses with closed doors; above, a faint, distant temple silhouette suggests the ‘true refuge’ he has missed.","primary_figures":["Misguided ascetic worshipper","Householders (in shadow)","A distant, subtle Vishnu presence (optional, as an unseen refuge)"],"setting":"Dusty village lanes at the edge of a town; scattered ash, a small flame, and a far-off shrine or tīrtha marker stone.","lighting_mood":"forest dappled","color_palette":["ash gray","dust brown","ember orange","faded ochre","nightfall blue"],"tanjore_prompt":"Tanjore painting style: moral-allegory panel with a gaunt ascetic holding a small flame, pot, and bowl; gold leaf used sparingly to highlight the distant Vishnu shrine as the true refuge; rich but restrained palette, ornate border framing the cautionary scene.","pahari_prompt":"Pahari miniature style: poignant realism—thin figure, delicate linework, muted earth tones; village houses with latticed windows, a distant riverbank or shrine; expressive faces conveying compassion and warning.","kerala_mural_prompt":"Kerala mural style: stylized ascetic with pronounced outlines, symbolic flame, and a distant temple icon; strong contrasts of red/ochre/black, didactic composition like a temple-wall moral panel.","pichwai_prompt":"Pichwai cloth painting style: allegorical composition with a central path leading to a distant Vishnu/ Krishna shrine; floral borders subdued; the ascetic’s bowl and pot rendered with textile-like patterning, ember motifs echoing the ‘mere flame’ theme."}
Audio Atmosphere: {"recitation_mood":"dramatic","suggested_raga":"Darbari","pace":"moderate-narrative","voice_tone":"authoritative","sound_elements":["dry wind","distant dogs","footsteps on dust","faint temple bell far away","brief silence after key words"]}
Sandhi Resolution Notes: yenārcayaṃti → yena arcayanti; bhavatorcyam → bhavataḥ arcyam; arcisterciṣ- → arciḥ te arciṣ-; kharpareṇa bhikṣām aṭaṃti → kharpareṇa bhikṣām aṭanti; paraveśmasu → para-veśmasu; ute(r)thahīnāḥ read as tīrtha-hīnāḥ.
FAQs
It criticizes a misguided form of worship/austerity centered on a mere flame (arcis) that leads to hardship and spiritual barrenness, implying that true worship should be rightly directed and spiritually fruitful.
It suggests being without true sacred refuge or purifying support—i.e., spiritually deprived—despite outward religious behavior like begging and wandering.
External austerity without right understanding or proper devotional orientation can result in suffering and emptiness; authentic spiritual practice should cultivate inner purpose, not merely visible hardship.