Adhyaya 16 — The Son’s Counsel on Renunciation and the Anasuya–Mandavya Episode: The Suspension of Sunrise and the Power of Pativrata
ब्राह्मण्युवाच माण्डव्येन महाभागे ! शप्तो भर्ता ममेश्वरः ।
सूर्योदये विनाशं त्वं प्राप्ससीत्यतिमन्युनाः ॥
brāhmaṇy uvāca māṇḍavyena mahābhāge! śapto bhartā mameśvaraḥ /
sūryodaye vināśaṃ tvaṃ prāpsyasīty ati-manyunā
พราหมณีกล่าวว่า “ข้าแต่นางผู้ประเสริฐ! นายและสามีของข้าถูกมานฑวยะสาปด้วยความกริ้วใหญ่ว่า ‘เมื่อสุริยะขึ้น เจ้าจักพบความพินาศ’”
{ "primaryRasa": "karuna", "secondaryRasa": "bhayanaka", "rasaIntensity": 0, "emotionalArcPosition": "", "moodDescriptors": [] }
Even a sage’s anger can precipitate grave outcomes; the narrative implicitly critiques ati-manyu (excessive wrath) and highlights the dharmic response—seeking protection through virtue and right counsel rather than retaliation.
Not a pancalakṣaṇa core (sarga/pratisarga/vaṃśa/manvantara/vaṃśānucarita) statement; it is vaṃśānucarita-style didactic narrative in purāṇic mode, used to teach dharma via story.
Sunrise marks the turning of time (kāla) and karmic fruition. A curse ‘at sunrise’ symbolizes inevitable karmic ripening unless countered by higher dharma/tapas aligned with ṛta.