Vṛddha-kanyā-carita and Balarāma’s Kurukṣetra Inquiry (वृद्धकन्या-चरितम् / कुरुक्षेत्रफल-प्रश्नः)
यद्वैतेषां भवेद् योग्यं वधाय विबुधद्विषाम् । परंतु भगवान् शक्र उस समय ऐसा कोई हथियार न पा सके, जो उन देदवद्रोहियोंके वधके लिये उपयोगी हो सके
yad vai teṣāṃ bhaved yogyaṃ vadhāya vibudhadvīṣām | parantu bhagavān śakraḥ tasmin samaye tādṛśaṃ kiñcid āyudhaṃ na prāpa, yat teṣāṃ devadrohiṇāṃ vadhāya upayogī syāt ||
ไวศัมปายนะกล่าวว่า “สิ่งใดก็ตามที่พึงเหมาะแก่การสังหารผู้เกลียดชังเหล่าเทพ ในกาลนั้นแม้ศักระผู้เป็นใหญ่ก็ยังไม่พบอาวุธใดเลย ที่จะเป็นประโยชน์แท้จริงในการทำลายเหล่าผู้ทรยศต่อเทพเหล่านั้น”
वैशम्पायन उवाच
Even divine authority is not automatically effective without the right means: righteous intent alone does not guarantee success. The verse highlights the ethical tension that punishment of grave wrongdoing (betrayal of the devas/cosmic order) still depends on appropriate instruments and circumstances.
The narrator Vaiśaṃpāyana describes a moment when Indra (Śakra), despite being the chief of the gods, cannot find a weapon suitable to kill certain enemies of the devas. The scene underscores the seriousness of the adversaries and the narrative need for a specific, destined means of their defeat.