Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 18

अश्वत्थामोवाच एवमेव यथा<5त्थ त्वं मातुलेह न संशय: । तैस्तु पूर्वमयं सेतु: शतधा विदलीकृत:,अश्वत्थामा बोला--मामाजी! आप जैसा कहते हैं, निःसंदेह वही ठीक है; परंतु पाण्डवोंने ही पहले इस धर्म-मर्यादाके सैकड़ों टुकड़े कर डाले हैं

Aśvatthāmovāca—evam eva yathāttha tvaṃ mātuleha na saṃśayaḥ | tais tu pūrvam ayaṃ setuḥ śatadhā vidalīkṛtaḥ ||

อัศวัตถามากล่าวว่า “เป็นดังที่ท่านว่าจริง ๆ ท่านลุง หาได้มีข้อสงสัยไม่ ทว่า ‘สะพาน’ แห่งขอบเขตธรรมะนี้ เขาทั้งหลายต่างหากที่ทำลายเสียก่อน ให้แตกเป็นร้อยเสี่ยง”

अश्वत्थामाAshvatthaman
अश्वत्थामा:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootअश्वत्थामन्
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
उवाचsaid
उवाच:
TypeVerb
Rootवच्
FormPerfect (Paroksha-bhuta), 3rd, Singular, Parasmaipada
एवम्thus, in this way
एवम्:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootएवम्
एवindeed, just
एव:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootएव
यथाas, just as
यथा:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootयथा
तथso, in that manner
तथ:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootतथा
त्वम्you
त्वम्:
Karta
TypePronoun
Rootयुष्मद्
Form—, Nominative, Singular
मातुलेO maternal uncle
मातुले:
TypeNoun
Rootमातुल
FormMasculine, Vocative, Singular
not
:
TypeIndeclinable
Root
संशयःdoubt
संशयः:
TypeNoun
Rootसंशय
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
तैःby them
तैः:
Karana
TypePronoun
Rootतद्
FormMasculine/Neuter, Instrumental, Plural
तुbut, however
तु:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootतु
पूर्वम्formerly, earlier
पूर्वम्:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootपूर्व
अयम्this
अयम्:
TypePronoun
Rootइदम्
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
सेतुःboundary, dam; (figuratively) moral restraint
सेतुः:
Karma
TypeNoun
Rootसेतु
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
शतधाinto a hundred parts, a hundredfold
शतधा:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootशतधा
विदलीकृतःsplit, shattered, broken into pieces
विदलीकृतः:
TypeVerb
Rootवि-दलि-कृ
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular, Past passive participle (क्त)

कृप उवाच

A
Aśvatthāmā
K
Kṛpa
P
Pāṇḍavas
S
setu (dharma-boundary/moral restraint)

Educational Q&A

The verse frames dharma as a protective boundary (setu). Aśvatthāmā argues that once moral limits are broken, further wrongdoing is rationalized as retaliation—highlighting how ethical collapse in war breeds self-justifying violence.

In the Sauptika Parva’s aftermath of the great war, Aśvatthāmā responds to Kṛpa, agreeing with him but insisting that the Pāṇḍavas had already violated the norms of righteous conduct, thereby ‘shattering’ the moral boundary first.