Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 31

तद्‌ दृष्टवा महदाश्चर्य दाशार्हा जातमन्यव: । तत्राजल्पन्‌ मिथ: केचित्‌ समाभाष्य परस्परम्‌

tad dṛṣṭvā mahad āścaryaṃ dāśārhā jātamanyavaḥ | tatrājalpan mithaḥ kecit samābhāṣya parasparam |

เมื่อเห็นอัศจรรย์อันยิ่งใหญ่นั้น ชาวทาศารหะ (ยาทวะ) ก็เดือดดาลด้วยโทสะ ณ ที่นั้นบางคนเริ่มสนทนากันเอง

तत्that (thing)
तत्:
Karma
TypePronoun
Rootतद्
FormNeuter, Accusative, Singular
दृष्ट्वाhaving seen
दृष्ट्वा:
TypeVerb
Rootदृश्
Formक्त्वा (absolutive/gerund), Parasmaipada (usage-neutral)
महत्great
महत्:
TypeAdjective
Rootमहत्
FormNeuter, Accusative, Singular
आश्चर्यम्wonder, marvel
आश्चर्यम्:
Karma
TypeNoun
Rootआश्चर्य
FormNeuter, Accusative, Singular
दाशार्हाःthe Dāśārhas (a Yādava clan)
दाशार्हाः:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootदाशार्ह
FormMasculine, Nominative, Plural
जातम्arisen, produced
जातम्:
TypeVerb
Rootजन्
Formक्त (past passive participle), Neuter, Accusative, Singular
मन्यवःwraths, angers
मन्यवः:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootमन्यु
FormMasculine, Nominative, Plural
तत्रthere
तत्र:
Adhikarana
TypeIndeclinable
Rootतत्र
अजल्पन्they spoke, they chatted
अजल्पन्:
TypeVerb
Rootजल्
FormImperfect (लङ्), 3rd, Plural, Parasmaipada
मिथःmutually, with one another
मिथः:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootमिथः
केचित्some (people)
केचित्:
Karta
TypePronoun
Rootकिम्
FormMasculine, Nominative, Plural
समाभाष्यhaving addressed, having spoken to
समाभाष्य:
TypeVerb
Rootसम्-आ-भाष्
Formल्यप् (absolutive/gerund), Parasmaipada (usage-neutral)
परस्परम्each other
परस्परम्:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootपरस्पर

वायुदेव उवाच

वायुदेव (Vāyudeva) (speaker)
दाशार्हाः / यादवाः (Dāśārhas/Yādavas)
रथ (chariot)

Educational Q&A

The verse highlights how extraordinary events provoke reflection on worthiness and discipline: survival in extreme situations is implicitly linked to inner restraint and merit, while also showing how people may hastily generalize such merit into rigid claims about social categories (varṇa).

Vāyudeva reports that the Yādavas, shocked by a remarkable incident, become angry and begin discussing it among themselves, speaking mutually about how astonishing it was that someone could remain alive on the chariot—treating the episode as evidence of exceptional capability.