ब्रह्मस्वहरण-निषेधः — Prohibition of Appropriating Brahmin Property
Brahmasva
तथा पापकृतं विप्रमाश्रमस्थं महीपते
tathā pāpakṛtaṁ vipram āśramasthaṁ mahīpate
ข้าแต่มหีปติ! ฉันใดก็ฉันนั้น พราหมณ์ผู้ก่อบาป แม้อยู่ในอาศรมแห่งวินัยธรรม ก็พึงถูกพิจารณาตามกรรมนั้น
चाण्डाल उवाच
Moral responsibility is not erased by social identity or religious residence: even a brahmin living in an āśrama remains accountable for sinful actions; dharma evaluates conduct, not merely status.
A Caṇḍāla addresses a king and draws an ethical comparison: he points out that if a brahmin commits wrongdoing, his being situated in an āśrama does not automatically sanctify him—setting up a broader argument about judging people by deeds.