Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 23

Chapter 15: Counsel on Initiative vs. Renunciation in the Rajasuya Project (सभापर्व, अध्याय १५)

क्षत्रिय: शस्त्रमरणो यदा भवति सत्कृत: । ततः सम मागधं संख्ये प्रतिबाधेम यद्‌ वयम्‌,क्षत्रिय जब युद्धमें अस्त्र-शस्त्रोंद्वारा मारा जाता है, तब यह उसका सत्कार है; अतः हमलोग जरासंधको द्वन्द-युद्धमें मार डालें

kṣatriyaḥ śastramaraṇo yadā bhavati satkṛtaḥ | tataḥ saṃ māgadhaṃ saṅkhye pratibādhema yad vayam ||

క్షత్రియుడు యుద్ధంలో ఆయుధాల చేత మరణిస్తే అదే అతనికి గౌరవం. కాబట్టి మనం రణరంగంలో ద్వంద్వయుద్ధంలో మగధరాజు (జరాసంధుడు)ను ఎదుర్కొని సంహరిద్దాం.

क्षत्रियःa Kshatriya (warrior)
क्षत्रियः:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootक्षत्रिय
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
शस्त्रमरणःone whose death is by weapons
शस्त्रमरणः:
Karta
TypeAdjective
Rootशस्त्रमरण
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
यदाwhen
यदा:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootयदा
भवतिbecomes / is
भवति:
TypeVerb
Rootभू
FormPresent, Third, Singular, Parasmaipada
सत्कृतःhonoured, duly respected
सत्कृतः:
TypeAdjective
Rootसत्कृत
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
ततःtherefore / then
ततः:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootततः
सम्together; completely (prefix-like usage)
सम्:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootसम्
मागधम्the Magadhan (Jarāsandha)
मागधम्:
Karma
TypeNoun
Rootमागध
FormMasculine, Accusative, Singular
संख्येin battle
संख्ये:
Adhikarana
TypeNoun
Rootसंख्या
FormFeminine, Locative, Singular
प्रतिबाधेमwe should oppose/repel; (contextually) we should subdue
प्रतिबाधेम:
TypeVerb
Rootप्रतिबाध्
FormOptative, First, Plural, Parasmaipada
यत्that / since / inasmuch as
यत्:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootयद्
वयम्we
वयम्:
Karta
TypePronoun
Rootअस्मद्
Form—, Nominative, Plural

कृष्ण उवाच

K
Kṛṣṇa
J
Jarāsandha (Māgadha)
K
kṣatriya (warrior class)
Ś
śastra (weapons)

Educational Q&A

Kṛṣṇa frames a warrior’s death by weapons in rightful battle as an honour (satkāra), expressing the Mahābhārata’s kṣatriya-dharma ideal that courage and acceptance of battle-death, when aligned with duty, is not disgrace but esteem.

Kṛṣṇa urges his side to engage the Magadhan ruler Jarāsandha directly in battlefield single combat, arguing that such a confrontation accords with warrior ethics and that defeating him in a duel is the appropriate course.