प्रलय-तत्त्वलयः, नीललोहित-रुद्रः, अष्टमूर्तिस्तवः, एवं ब्रह्मणो वैराग्यम्
तस्यैवं तप्यमानस्य न किंचित्समवर्तत ततो दीर्घेण कालेन दुःखात्क्रोधो व्यजायत
tasyaivaṃ tapyamānasya na kiṃcitsamavartata tato dīrgheṇa kālena duḥkhātkrodho vyajāyata
இவ்வாறு தவம் செய்தபோதும் அவனுக்கு எந்தப் பயனும் வெளிப்படவில்லை. பின்னர் நீண்ட காலத்திற்குப் பிறகு, துயரமும் ஏமாற்றமும் காரணமாக அவனுள் கோபம் எழுந்தது.
Suta Goswami (narrating to the sages of Naimisharanya)
It underscores that mere exertion (tapas) may not yield fruit unless aligned with Shiva’s anugraha (grace) and right inner disposition—Linga worship is not only outer rite but inner purification of pasha-born impulses like frustration and anger.
By implication, Shiva-tattva is the sovereign Pati who alone grants fruition; the absence of immediate results highlights that siddhi is not mechanically produced but bestowed when the pashu becomes fit through purification and surrender.
Tapas as a limb of Pashupata-oriented discipline is highlighted, along with the crucial yogic lesson: when results delay, krodha can arise—so the aspirant must transmute anger into steadiness (dhairya) and devotion (bhakti) toward Pati, Shiva.