Upamanyu’s Tapas, Shiva’s Indra-Form Test, and the Bestowal of Kshiroda and Gaṇapatya
सहैव चारुह्य तदा द्विपं तं प्रगृह्य वालव्यजनं विवस्वान् /* वामेन शच्या सहितं सुरेन्द्रं करेण चान्येन सितातपत्रम्
sahaiva cāruhya tadā dvipaṃ taṃ pragṛhya vālavyajanaṃ vivasvān /* vāmena śacyā sahitaṃ surendraṃ kareṇa cānyena sitātapatram
सहैव चारुह्य तदा द्विपं तं प्रगृह्य वालव्यजनं विवस्वान् । वामेन शच्या सहितं सुरेन्द्रं करेण चान्येन सितातपत्रम् ॥
Suta Goswami (narrating to the sages at Naimisharanya)
Though not a direct liṅga-pūjā injunction, the verse models “sammāna” (reverential service) through chāmara and white parasol—an archetype later mirrored in Śiva-pūjā upacāras, where honor offered outwardly becomes inner devotion toward Pati (Śiva).
Indirectly, it shows the Purāṇic principle that even the highest Devas operate within ordered ranks and ceremonial duty; Shaiva Siddhānta reads this as a contrast to Śiva as Pati—transcendent Lord beyond such offices—while Devas remain pashu-like dependents under cosmic governance.
The highlighted practice is formal honor (upacāra) and auspicious royal emblems (chāmara, chatra), which correspond to external pūjā services; in a yogic reading, disciplined reverence and humility loosen pasha (bondage) by turning the mind toward the supreme Pati rather than worldly status.