च्यवन-यज्ञे अश्विनोः सोमग्रहण-विवादः
Cyavana’s Sacrifice and the Aśvins’ Soma Dispute
इन्द्र उवाच उभावेतौ न सोमार्हौ नासत्याविति मे मति: । भिषजोौ दिवि देवानां कर्मणा तेन नाहत:,इन्द्र बोले--मुने! मेरा यह सिद्धान्त है कि ये दोनों अश्विनीकुमार यज्ञमें सोमपानके अधिकारी नहीं हैं; क्योंकि ये द्युलोकनिवासी देवताओंके वैद्य हैं और उस वैद्यवृत्तिके कारण ही इन्हें यज्ञमें सोमपानका अधिकार नहीं रह गया है
indra uvāca: ubhāv etau na somārhau nāsatyāv iti me matiḥ | bhiṣajau divi devānāṁ karmaṇā tena nāhataḥ ||
Индра сказал: «По моему твердому суждению, эти двое Насатьев (близнецы Ашвины) не имеют права пить сому на жертвоприношении. Ибо они служат врачевателями богов на небесах; и из‑за этого занятия, на мой взгляд, их право на сому в обряде умалено.»
इन्द्र उवाच
The verse highlights a ritual-ethical debate: eligibility for sacred privileges (like Soma-drinking) is argued to depend not only on status but also on one’s occupational role and perceived ritual purity. Indra frames the Aśvins’ medical service as a reason for exclusion, raising questions about how profession and purity norms shape access to religious rites.
Indra states his position in a dispute about whether the Aśvin twins may partake of Soma in a sacrifice. He argues they should be barred because they function as the gods’ physicians in heaven, and that role, in his view, disqualifies them from Soma participation.