Shukra’s Curse on King Danda and Prahlada’s Counsel to Andhaka on Dharma
बाणाः कार्तस्वरो हस्ती सूर्यशत्रुर्महोदरः अयःशुङ्कुः शिबिः शाल्वो वृषपर्वा विरोचनः
bāṇāḥ kārtasvaro hastī sūryaśatrurmahodaraḥ ayaḥśuṅkuḥ śibiḥ śālvo vṛṣaparvā virocanaḥ
അപ്പോൾ ആകാശവിസ്താരത്തിൽ ദേവന്മാർ—ഇന്ദ്രൻ, വിഷ്ണു, പിതാമഹൻ (ബ്രഹ്മാവ്) സഹിതം, സൂര്യനും അഗ്നിയും മുൻപിൽ നിൽക്കേ—കാണുവാൻ ആഗ്രഹിച്ച് ഒന്നിച�Vamana Purana,40,62,VamP 40.62,hayagrīvaḥ kālanemiḥ saṃhlādaḥ kālanāśanaḥ śarabhaḥ śalabhaścaiva vipracittiśca vīryavān,हयग्रीवः कालनेमिः संह्लादः कालनाशनः शरभः शलभश्चैव विप्रचित्तिश्च वीर्यवान्,Andhaka Vadha,Mythic Battle Narrative (Daitya Enumeration),Adhyaya 40 (title not provided in input; context: Andhaka-vadha / conflict with Tryambaka),62,hayagrīvaḥ kālanemiḥ saṃhlādaḥ kālanāśanaḥ śarabhaḥ śalabhaścaiva vipracittiśca vīryavān,hayagrīvaḥ kālanemiḥ saṃhlādaḥ kāla-nāśanaḥ | śarabhaḥ śalabhaś caiva vipracittiś ca vīryavān ||,(And also:) Hayagrīva
{ "primaryRasa": "vira", "secondaryRasa": "raudra", "rasaIntensity": 0, "emotionalArcPosition": "", "moodDescriptors": [] }
Yes, the syntax continues the mustering motif: a coalition of daitya/asura champions assembling for a campaign against Śiva (Tryambaka). Purāṇic narration often compresses command structure and focuses on the prestige of named combatants.
Name-reuse across traditions is common. A Purāṇic roster may preserve an older or alternate identification, or the name may refer to a different figure sharing the same appellation. Without additional qualifiers (lineage, epithet, deeds), the verse cannot securely equate this Śibi with the celebrated donor-king of other narratives.
They anchor the episode in well-known daitya genealogies: Virocana (often linked to Prahlāda’s line) and Vṛṣaparvan (known from other mythic cycles) signal that the conflict is not local or minor but involves major asura houses.