Prahlada’s Defeat by Nara-Narayana and Victory through Bhakti
किं भवद्भ्यां समारःधं दम्भं धर्मविनाशनम् क्व तपः क्व जटाभारः क्व चेमौ प्रवरायुधौ
kiṃ bhavadbhyāṃ samāraḥdhaṃ dambhaṃ dharmavināśanam kva tapaḥ kva jaṭābhāraḥ kva cemau pravarāyudhau
Por que empreendestes esta hipocrisia que destrói o dharma? Que relação tem a austeridade com uma massa de cabelos emaranhados, e que relação têm com isso estas duas armas excelentes?
{ "primaryRasa": "raudra", "secondaryRasa": "vira", "rasaIntensity": 0, "emotionalArcPosition": "", "moodDescriptors": [] }
The verse condemns religious ostentation (dambha) as dharma-destroying; it also exposes how the critic can be morally right about hypocrisy yet wrong in application when confronting genuine divinity in disguise.
Carita-oriented narrative: it frames a moral accusation that precipitates the ensuing revelation/conflict, functioning as a didactic moment within an episode.
‘Tapas’ and ‘jaṭā’ symbolize renunciation, while ‘supreme weapons’ symbolize sovereign power and protection. Their juxtaposition points to the Purāṇic ideal that true divine authority can encompass both ascetic restraint and martial guardianship—without hypocrisy.