Śreyas and Paramārtha: The Ribhu–Nidāgha Teaching on Non-Dual Self
Advaita
तत्कारणानुगमनाज्जायते नृप मृन्मयम् । एवं विनाशिभिर्द्रव्यैः समिदाज्यकुशादिभिः ॥ २३ ॥
tatkāraṇānugamanājjāyate nṛpa mṛnmayam | evaṃ vināśibhirdravyaiḥ samidājyakuśādibhiḥ || 23 ||
Ó rei, um objeto de barro vem a existir por seguir, isto é, por depender de sua causa — a argila. Do mesmo modo, os efeitos surgem de materiais perecíveis como gravetos de fogo ritual, ghee, relva kuśa e semelhantes.
Sanatkumara (in instruction to a king within the Narada–Sanatkumara dialogue frame)
Vrata: none
Primary Rasa: shanta
Secondary Rasa: none
It points to causal dependence and impermanence: effects arise from their material causes, and when the causes are perishable, the results are also transient—encouraging detachment and a turn toward moksha.
By highlighting the perishability of external ritual inputs (samid, ghee, kuśa), it implicitly redirects the seeker toward lasting refuge—steadfast devotion and inner surrender—rather than relying only on transient material supports.
It references core ritual dravyas used in Vedic yajña (samit, ājya, kuśa), aligning with Kalpa (Vedāṅga dealing with ritual procedure) and the practical understanding that ritual components are materially conditioned and finite.