Shloka 42
Dambhodbhava, Nara-Nārāyaṇa, and the Counsel to Abandon Hubris
Udyoga-parva 94
स्थाता न: समये तस्मिन् पितेति कृतनिश्चया: । नाहास्म समयं तात तच्च नो ब्राह्मणा विदु:
sthātā naḥ samaye tasmin pite iti kṛtaniścayāḥ | nāhāsma samayaṃ tāta tac ca no brāhmaṇā viduḥ ||
Vaiśampāyana disse: “Convencidos de que, no tempo marcado, nosso pai se manteria fiel ao seu voto—‘ele de fato agirá como nosso pai’—nunca violamos a condição acordada, senhor; e os brâmanes que permaneceram conosco sabem que isto é verdade.”
वैशम्पायन उवाच
Educational Q&A
The verse underscores dharma as fidelity to a sworn agreement: moral authority and rightful claim rest on keeping one’s pledged terms, and public witnesses (here, Brahmins) strengthen the ethical and social legitimacy of that truth.
In the Udyoga Parva’s lead-up to war, the speaker reports a claim that the exiled party never broke the stipulated conditions of their agreement; they endured the term relying on the expectation that the ‘father’ figure would honor his promise at the appointed time, with Brahmins serving as corroborating witnesses.