Gāndhārī’s Grief, Vyāsa’s Pacification, and the Ethics of Retaliation (गान्धारी-शोकः शमोपदेशश्च)
ततोअन्यवृत्तमात्मानं समवेक्षस्व भारत । राजंस्त्वं हविधेयात्मा दुर्योधनवशे स्थित:
tato 'nyavṛttam ātmānaṁ samavekṣasva bhārata | rājan tvaṁ ha vidheyātmā duryodhanavaśe sthitaḥ ||
Então, ó Bhārata, contempla de perto o teu próprio rumo de conduta, agora alterado. Ó rei, tornaste-te alguém cuja vontade é governada por outrem, permanecendo sob o jugo de Duryodhana—um aviso ético: a perda do autogoverno e do discernimento afasta o soberano do dharma e o conduz a escolhas ruinosas.
वैशम्पायन उवाच
A ruler must retain self-governance and moral discernment; surrendering one’s will to a partial, unrighteous influence (here, Duryodhana) is portrayed as a decisive ethical failure that distorts conduct and leads to destructive outcomes.
Vaiśampāyana, narrating events, points to the king’s changed behavior and urges him to examine himself, emphasizing that he has been acting under Duryodhana’s dominance—framing the catastrophe as rooted in compromised judgment and misplaced compliance.