Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 192

आपद्धर्मनिर्णयः — विश्वामित्र-श्वपचसंवादः

Apaddharma Determination: Dialogue of Viśvāmitra and the Śvapaca

संस्तवैर्वा धनौधैर्वा नाहं शक्‍्य: पुनस्त्वया । नह्ामित्रे वशं यान्ति प्राज्ञा निष्कारणं सखे

saṁstavair vā dhanaughair vā nāhaṁ śakyaḥ punas tvayā | nāham mitre vaśaṁ yānti prājñā niṣkāraṇaṁ sakhe ||

Disse Lomaśa: “Nem por lisonja nem por montes de riquezas podes conquistar-me de novo. Amigo, não posso voltar a ficar sob o teu poder. Homens sábios e discernentes não se colocam, sem causa imperiosa, sob o controle de um inimigo.”

संस्तवैःby praises/eulogies
संस्तवैः:
Karana
TypeNoun
Rootसंस्तव
FormMasculine, Instrumental, Plural
वाor
वा:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootवा
धन-ओधैःby heaps/streams of wealth
धन-ओधैः:
Karana
TypeNoun
Rootधन-ओध
FormMasculine, Instrumental, Plural
वाor
वा:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootवा
not
:
TypeIndeclinable
Root
अहम्I
अहम्:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootअहम्
FormNominative, Singular
शक्यःable/possible (to be won over)
शक्यः:
TypeAdjective
Rootशक्य
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
पुनःagain
पुनः:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootपुनः
त्वयाby you
त्वया:
Karana
TypeNoun
Rootत्वद्
FormInstrumental, Singular
not
:
TypeIndeclinable
Root
हिindeed/for
हि:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootहि
अमित्रेin/under an enemy
अमित्रे:
Adhikarana
TypeNoun
Rootअमित्र
FormMasculine, Locative, Singular
वशम्control/subjection
वशम्:
Karma
TypeNoun
Rootवश
FormMasculine, Accusative, Singular
यान्तिgo/submit
यान्ति:
TypeVerb
Rootया
FormPresent, Third, Plural
प्राज्ञाःwise men
प्राज्ञाः:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootप्राज्ञ
FormMasculine, Nominative, Plural
निष्कारणम्without cause/for no reason
निष्कारणम्:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootनिष्कारण
सखेO friend
सखे:
TypeNoun
Rootसखि
FormMasculine, Vocative, Singular

लोमश उवाच

L
Lomaśa

Educational Q&A

Flattery and material inducements are not sufficient grounds for trust. A wise person does not surrender autonomy or fall under an adversary’s control without a compelling, well-judged reason.

Lomaśa addresses someone as a ‘friend’ yet treats him as an enemy in practical terms, rejecting attempts to win him over through praise or wealth and asserting a principle of cautious, reason-based trust.