Kāraṇānvēṣaṇam: The 32 Marks of Hari, Defects (Doṣas), Death-Omens, and Hari’s Omnipresence in Social & Household Life
खगेन्द्र तस्माल्लक्षणे साम्यचित्तं विश्वादीनां सर्वदा मा कुरुष्व / अष्टाविंशतिं प्राहू रुद्रादिकानां भ्रूनेत्रयोर्लक्षणेनैव हीनाः
khagendra tasmāllakṣaṇe sāmyacittaṃ viśvādīnāṃ sarvadā mā kuruṣva / aṣṭāviṃśatiṃ prāhū rudrādikānāṃ bhrūnetrayorlakṣaṇenaiva hīnāḥ
Ó senhor das aves, por isso não suponhas jamais que os Viśvas e os demais grupos sejam todos iguais apenas por sinais exteriores. Diz-se que vinte e oito entre a classe dos Rudras e seres afins são, por esse mesmo critério, deficientes no sinal da sobrancelha e do (terceiro) olho.
Lord Vishnu (speaking to Garuda)
Concept: Do not infer sameness from outward marks; true classification requires deeper lakshana (defining characteristics).
Vedantic Theme: Nama-rupa (name-form) can mislead; discernment (viveka) distinguishes essential from accidental attributes.
Application: Avoid stereotyping: in study, theology, or daily life, verify defining features rather than relying on surface indicators.
Primary Rasa: shanta
Secondary Rasa: adbhuta
Related Themes: Garuda Purana 3.22.20 (context of comparative lakshanas); Garuda Purana 3.22.22 (warning about contemplating defective signs)
The verse warns that outward ‘marks’ are not a reliable basis to assume sameness among divine groups; classification and status cannot be reduced to external features alone.
Vishnu instructs Garuda with doctrinal precision, clarifying that even among exalted beings (Viśvas, Rudras), some may lack specific defining signs—so discernment must be careful and scripturally grounded.
Do not judge spiritual worth by external appearance or labels; apply discrimination (viveka) and ethical conduct (dharma) as the real measures of spiritual maturity.