Prāyaścitta-vidhāna: Tapas, Dāna, Vrata, and Proportional Expiation (प्रायश्चित्तविधानम्)
दश वा वेदशास्त्रज्ञास्त्रयो वा धर्मपाठका: । यद् ब्रूयु: कार्य उत्पन्ने स धर्मो धर्मसंशये
daśa vā vedaśāstrajñās trayo vā dharmapāṭhakāḥ | yad brūyuḥ kārya utpanne sa dharmo dharmasaṃśaye ||
ବ୍ୟାସ କହିଲେ—କୌଣସି କାର୍ଯ୍ୟପ୍ରସଙ୍ଗ ଉପସ୍ଥିତ ହୋଇ ଧର୍ମନିର୍ଣ୍ଣୟରେ ସନ୍ଦେହ ହେଲେ, ବିଶେଷକରି ପ୍ରାୟଶ୍ଚିତ୍ତ ବିଷୟରେ, ବେଦ-ଶାସ୍ତ୍ରଜ୍ଞ ଦଶଜଣ ବ୍ରାହ୍ମଣ କିମ୍ବା ନିତ୍ୟ ଧର୍ମପାଠ-ବିଚାରରେ ନିମଗ୍ନ ତିନିଜଣ ବ୍ରାହ୍ମଣ ଆଲୋଚନା କରି ଯାହା କହନ୍ତି, ସେହିକୁ ଧର୍ମ ଭାବେ ଗ୍ରହଣ କରିବା ଉଚିତ।
व्यास उवाच
When dharma is uncertain in a real-life situation—especially regarding expiation—one should rely on a qualified collective judgment: either ten experts in Veda and śāstra, or three dedicated specialists in dharma-study. Their considered verdict is to be treated as dharma for that case.
In the Śānti Parva’s instruction on righteous conduct, Vyāsa lays down a practical rule for resolving moral-legal ambiguity: when texts or circumstances leave doubt, consult a competent council of learned Brāhmaṇas and accept their deliberated decision as the applicable dharma.