तस्योपविष्टस्य मुनेरुत्सड़ेश निपपात ह । अवातमशुकादष्टमेकमाम्रफलं किल,उसी समय वहाँ बैठे हुए मुनिकी गोदमें एक आमका फल गिरा। वह न हवाके चलनेसे गिरा था, न किसी तोतेने ही उस फलमें अपनी चोंच गड़ायी थी
tasyopaviṣṭasya muner utsaṅge nipapāta ha | avātam aśukādaṣṭam ekam āmraphalaṁ kila ||
ସେହି ସମୟରେ ବସିଥିବା ମୁନିଙ୍କ ଉତ୍ସଙ୍ଗରେ ଗୋଟିଏ ଆମ୍ବ ଫଳ ପଡ଼ିଲା। ତାହା ନ ପବନରେ ଖସିଥିଲା, ନ କୌଣସି ଶୁଆ ଠୁଣ୍ଠି ମାରିଥିଲା।
श्रीकृष्ण उवाच
The verse highlights an event presented as beyond ordinary physical causation (neither wind nor a bird), nudging the listener to consider that outcomes may arise from subtle, unseen factors—often framed in the epic as the working of destiny, merit, or dharma.
A sage is seated, and a mango drops directly into his lap. The text explicitly rules out common causes (wind or a parrot’s pecking), marking the incident as noteworthy—an omen-like occurrence that sets up or supports the surrounding narrative point.