Ahiṃsā as Threefold Restraint (Mind–Speech–Action) and the Ethics of Consumption
यदि गुरु अपने पुत्रके समान शिष्यको बिना कारणके ही मारता-पीटता है तो वह अपनी स्वेच्छा-चारिताके कारण हिंसक पशुकी योनिमें जन्म लेता है ।।
yadi guruḥ svaputrasamaṁ śiṣyaṁ akāraṇenaiva mārati tāḍayati vā, sa svacchandacāritvāt hiṁsaka-paśu-yoniṁ prāpnoti. pitaraṁ mātaraṁ caiva yastu putro ’vamanyate, so ’pi rājan mṛto janantuḥ pūrvaṁ jāyeta gardabhaḥ.
ଯଦି ଗୁରୁ ପୁତ୍ରସମ ଶିଷ୍ୟକୁ ଅକାରଣେ ମାରେ-ପିଟେ, ତେବେ ସ୍ୱେଚ୍ଛାଚାରର ଦୋଷରୁ ସେ ହିଂସ୍ର ପଶୁଯୋନିରେ ପଡ଼େ। ଏବଂ ହେ ରାଜନ, ଯେ ପୁତ୍ର ପିତା-ମାତାଙ୍କୁ ଅବମାନ କରେ, ସେ ମଧ୍ୟ ମୃତ୍ୟୁ ପରେ ପ୍ରଥମେ ଗଧା ହୋଇ ଜନ୍ମ ନେଏ।
युधिछिर उवाच
Authority must be exercised according to dharma: a teacher should not punish a disciple arbitrarily, and a son must honor father and mother. Unjust violence and filial contempt are portrayed as grave ethical failures that lead to degrading rebirths.
Yudhiṣṭhira addresses a king and cites moral consequences: an unjustly violent teacher falls into an animal birth, and a son who dishonors his parents is reborn first as a donkey. The statement functions as a didactic warning within Anuśāsana Parva’s ethical instruction.