Adhyaya 4 — Jaimini Meets the Dharmapakshis: Four Doubts on the Mahabharata and the Opening of Narayana Doctrine
कस्माच्च पाण्डुपुत्राणामेका सा द्रुपदात्मजा ।
पञ्चानां महिषी कृष्णा सुमहानत्र संशयः ॥
kasmācca pāṇḍuputrāṇām ekā sā drupadātmajā /
pañcānāṃ mahiṣī kṛṣṇā sumāhan atra saṃśayaḥ //
“ထို့ပြင် ဒြုပဒ၏ တစ်ဦးတည်းသော သမီး—ကృష్ణာ (ဒြောပဒီ)—သည် ပာဏ္ဍု၏ သားငါးဦး၏ အဓိက မဟေသီ ဖြစ်လာရခြင်းမှာ အဘယ်ကြောင့်နည်း။ ဤအကြောင်း၌ သံသယ အလွန်ကြီးမားသည်။”
{ "primaryRasa": "adbhuta", "secondaryRasa": "shanta", "rasaIntensity": 0, "emotionalArcPosition": "", "moodDescriptors": [] }
The verse foregrounds a dharmic problem framed as a sincere doubt: an apparent irregularity (one wife for five brothers) demands explanation through scripture, precedent, and purpose. Ethically, it models the Purāṇic method—do not dismiss moral tension; inquire so that dharma is understood in its contextual, exception-aware form (āpaddharma/niyama-bheda).
Primarily aligns with Vaṃśa/Vaṃśānucarita (genealogies and dynastic narratives), since it concerns the Pāṇḍavas and Draupadī and invites an explanatory backstory or rationale. It is not directly Sarga/Pratisarga/Manvantara in this verse.
On a symbolic reading common in later exegesis, the ‘one’ (ekā) shared among ‘five’ can be read as a unifying principle (śrī/fortune, or a single dharmic purpose) integrating multiple faculties/lines. However, in the immediate Purāṇic register this verse functions chiefly as a narrative-theological question seeking the lawful cause (kāraṇa) behind an extraordinary marriage arrangement.