Jyotiṣa-śāstra Saṅgraha: Threefold Division, Gaṇita Methods, Muhūrta, and Planetary Reckoning
त्रिभानांगार्कविश्लेषांशोंशोनघ्नाः । पुरंदराः । हराप्तालंबनं स्वर्णवित्रिभेर्काधिकोनके ॥ १६० ॥
tribhānāṃgārkaviśleṣāṃśoṃśonaghnāḥ | puraṃdarāḥ | harāptālaṃbanaṃ svarṇavitribherkādhikonake || 160 ||
Bait ini dalam naskhah yang sampai kepada kita tampak sangat rosak dan bercelaru, seakan-akan senarai mnemonik (mungkin nama gelaran atau istilah teknikal) dan bukan sebuah śloka yang lengkap. Oleh itu, terjemahan yang pasti dan koheren tidak dapat diberikan tanpa merujuk edisi kritikal atau manuskrip selari.
Sanatkumara (to Narada) — attribution based on the dominant dialogue frame of Book 1.2 (Moksha-dharma), but this specific line needs chapter-level verification.
Vrata: none
Primary Rasa: shanta
Secondary Rasa: none
In its present form, the line reads like a damaged mnemonic enumeration (names/terms) rather than a clear teaching; its significance likely lies in cataloguing epithets or technical items within a mokṣa-dharma discussion, but the exact doctrinal point cannot be stated reliably without a verified reading.
This transmitted text does not explicitly present a bhakti instruction (such as nāma-smaraṇa, pūjā, or Viṣṇu-stuti). If the verse belongs to a list of divine epithets, it may support devotional recollection, but a dependable bhakti linkage requires a corrected śloka from a critical source.
The appearance of terms like Aṅgāraka (Mars) suggests an astrological/technical register (Jyotiṣa-vedāṅga), but the verse is too corrupt to extract a usable rule; it mainly highlights the need for careful textual collation when using Purāṇic verses for ritual or jyotiṣa application.