Bharata’s Attachment and the Palanquin Teaching on ‘I’ and ‘Mine’
किं हेतुभिर्वदूत्येषा वागेवाहमिति स्वयम् । तथापि वागहमेद्वक्तुमित्थं न युज्यते ॥ ७९ ॥
kiṃ hetubhirvadūtyeṣā vāgevāhamiti svayam | tathāpi vāgahamedvaktumitthaṃ na yujyate || 79 ||
“Mengapa ia perlu berkata dengan bersandar pada alasan-alasan? Ucapan (vāk) sendiri menyatakan, dengan sendirinya, ‘Akulah ucapan.’ Namun demikian, tidak wajar menyebutnya begini: ‘Aku ialah ucapan.’”
Sanatkumara (teaching Narada in the Moksha-Dharma dialogue)
Vrata: none
Primary Rasa: shanta
Secondary Rasa: none
It cautions against mistaking an instrument (speech) for the Self: even if speech can describe itself, identifying oneself as “speech” reflects misplaced self-identity and is therefore unfitting.
By discouraging egoic self-definitions (“I am this/that”), it supports humility and inner purification—conditions that make devotion steadier and less entangled in pride of learning or eloquence.
It indirectly points to Vyākaraṇa and disciplined Vāk-prayoga (right use of speech): mastery of words is secondary to right understanding, and speech should be governed by discernment rather than self-assertion.