Gāndhārī’s Grief, Vyāsa’s Pacification, and the Ethics of Retaliation (गान्धारी-शोकः शमोपदेशश्च)
इदानीं त्वहमव्यग्रो गतमन्युर्गतज्वर: । मध्यमं पाण्डवं वीर द्रष्टमेच्छामि माधव,“माधव! अब इस समय मैं शान्त हूँ। मेरा क्रोध उतर गया है और चिन्ता भी दूर हो गयी है; अतः मैं मध्यम पाण्डव वीर अर्जुनको देखना चाहता हूँ
idānīṁ tv aham avyagro gatamanyur gatajvaraḥ | madhyamaṁ pāṇḍavaṁ vīra draṣṭum icchāmi mādhava ||
Vaiśampāyana berkata: “Kini aku tenang dan tidak lagi gelisah. Amarahku telah surut dan demam resahku telah berlalu. Maka, wahai Mādhava, aku ingin melihat Pāṇḍava yang di tengah—wira Arjuna.”
वैशम्पायन उवाच
The verse highlights the ethical necessity of mastering anger and inner agitation before seeking dialogue or encounter. Composure (avyagra) and the cooling of wrath (gata-manyu) are presented as prerequisites for a clear, dharmic intention—here, the wish to meet Arjuna without being driven by rage or turmoil.
In the Stree Parva’s post-war setting, the speaker declares that his earlier anger and distress have subsided and expresses a desire to see the ‘middle Pāṇḍava,’ identified as Arjuna, addressing Mādhava (Kṛṣṇa). This signals a shift from heated emotion toward a deliberate meeting in the aftermath of the Kurukṣetra catastrophe.