Rudra-Śiva: Names, Two Natures, and the Logic of Epithets (रुद्रनाम-बहुरूपत्व-प्रकरणम्)
एष तेषां विशुद्धानां फेनपानां तपोधने । धर्मचर्याकृतो मार्गो बालखिल्यगणै: शृणु
eṣa teṣāṃ viśuddhānāṃ phenapānāṃ tapodhane | dharmacaryākṛto mārgo bālakhilyagaṇaiḥ śṛṇu, tapodhane ||
“Wahai khazanah tapa, inilah jalan laku benar yang ditetapkan bagi para resi yang disucikan, iaitu para pertapa Phenapāna. Sekarang, wahai yang kaya dengan tapa, dengarlah jalan dharma sebagaimana diajarkan oleh kelompok resi yang disebut Bālakhilya.”
श्रीमहेश्वर उवाच
Dharma is presented as a disciplined ‘path’ (mārga) grounded in purified conduct (dharma-caryā). The verse frames ethical life as something established and transmitted by exemplary ascetic lineages—first the Phenapānas, then the Bālakhilyas—implying that righteous practice is learned through authoritative tradition and lived austerity.
Maheśvara addresses an ascetic (called ‘tapodhane’) and transitions from one authoritative model of dharma (the purified Phenapāna sages) to another (the Bālakhilya sages). It functions as a connective verse: having indicated one established path, the speaker now invites the listener to hear the next teaching ascribed to the Bālakhilya group.