मेना-हिमालयसंवादः
Menā’s Counsel to Himālaya; Response to Slander of Śiva
मां ज्ञात्वा तौ परं ब्रह्म दम्पती परभक्तितः । दातुकामावभूतां च स्वसुतां वेदरीतितः
māṃ jñātvā tau paraṃ brahma dampatī parabhaktitaḥ | dātukāmāvabhūtāṃ ca svasutāṃ vedarītitaḥ
എന്നെ പരബ്രഹ്മമായി തിരിച്ചറിഞ്ഞ്, ആ ദമ്പതികൾ പരമഭക്തിയോടെ, വേദവിധിപ്രകാരം സ്വന്തം പുത്രിയെ ദാനം (വിവാഹാർഥം) ചെയ്യാൻ ആഗ്രഹികളായി।
Suta Goswami (narrating the Parvati Khanda account to the sages at Naimisharanya)
Tattva Level: pati
Shiva Form: Umāpati
Sthala Purana: Not a Jyotirliṅga episode; the verse frames the sages’ Vedicly-sanctioned intent to offer their daughter (Pārvatī) in marriage after recognizing Śiva as Parabrahman.
Significance: Establishes the doctrinal basis for Śiva as Parabrahman and legitimizes Śaiva dharma within Vedic maryādā—seen as meritorious śraddhā and bhakti leading to Śiva’s grace.
Shakti Form: Pārvatī
Role: liberating
The verse highlights a core Shaiva teaching: true recognition of Shiva as Parabrahman naturally ripens into parā-bhakti, which then expresses itself as dharmic, Veda-aligned conduct rather than mere emotion.
Although it speaks of Shiva as the Supreme Brahman (nirguṇa reality), the response is devotional and practical—showing how realization of the highest truth supports saguna worship and righteous ritual order in the world.
The takeaway is to unite devotion with śāstra: maintain steady bhakti (e.g., japa of the Pañcākṣarī “Om Namaḥ Śivāya”) while performing duties and rites in a Vedic, disciplined manner.