Valmiki Ramayana 2.12.98-99: Ayodhya Kanda, Sarga 12, Shlokas 98-99
द्वादशः सर्गः · Kaikeyi’s Boons and Dasaratha’s Moral Collapse
Ayodhya Kanda 12
Spoken by King DaśarathaSetting: Ayodhya (inner palace quarters implied)Pre-exile contemplation (before departure to Daṇḍaka)
यस्य त्वाहारसमये सूदाः कुण्डलधारिणः ॥९८॥
अहंपूर्वाः पचन्ति स्म प्रशस्तं पानभोजनम् ।
स कथन्नु कषायाणि तिक्तानि कटुकानि च ॥९९॥
भक्षयन्वन्यमाहारं सुतो मे वर्तयिष्यति ।
yasya tvāhārasamaye sūdāḥ kuṇḍaladhāriṇaḥ ||98||
ahaṃpūrvāḥ pacanti sma praśastaṃ pānabhojanam |
sa kathannu kaṣāyāṇi tiktāni kaṭukāni ca ||99||
bhakṣayanvanyamāhāraṃ suto me vartayiṣyati |
ആഹാരസമയത്ത് കുണ്ഡലധാരികളായ പാചകരെക്കൊണ്ട് ഞാൻ മുമ്പിൽ നിന്നു അഭിമാനത്തോടെ സമൃദ്ധമായ ഉത്തമ പാനഭോജനങ്ങൾ ഒരുക്കിപ്പിച്ചിരുന്ന എന്റെ പുത്രൻ, ഇനി വന്യാഹാരമായി കഷായവും തിക്തവും കടുപ്പമുള്ള കടുവും ആയ വസ്തുക്കൾ തിന്ന് എങ്ങനെ ജീവിക്കും?
Sandhi Notes
- त्वाहारसमये = तु + आहारसमये
- अहंपूर्वाः = अहम् + पूर्वाः
- कथन्नु = कथम् + नु
- भक्षयन् वन्यमाहारम् = भक्षयन् + वन्यम् + आहारम् (often written as वन्यमाहारम्)
How will my son for whom the cooks with kundalas in their ears used to proudly prepare enough food and beverages subsist on astringent, pungent, bitter wild fruits and roots?
The teaching
Even rightful love becomes a source of suffering when confronted with impermanence; dharma may demand endurance of austerity.
Duties in tension
- Maternal protection and nurture of Rama
- Obedience to royal dharma/command leading to exile
- Acceptance of fate vs resistance born of attachment
- Ethical theme
- Gṛhastha-dharma vs rāja-dharma (role-duty conflict)
- How it resolves
- Lamentation preceding acceptance
For your practice
Contemplation on non-attachment and compassion; using grief as a doorway to śaraṇāgati (surrender) to dharma.
Mood and themes
- Rasa
- Karuna (compassion), with Shringara (love)
- Mood
- Maternal anguish, palace-to-forest contrast, foreboding
Themes
- Dharma
- Ethics
- Compassion
- Renunciation
- Royal vs ascetic life
Shift from viṣaya-bhoga (sense-enjoyment) to tapas-like simplicity; the mother’s grief mirrors attachment (rāga) confronted by impermanence (anityatā).
Kaṭha Upaniṣad’s contrast of preyas vs śreyas is suggested by the move from refined palace pleasures to austere forest fare.
- Kausalya and Rama
- Mother-son (maternal care/anxiety) (compassionate)
Ayodhyākāṇḍa 2.13.10-11 (Kaushalya’s sorrow and wish for death); Ayodhyākāṇḍa 2.20+ (forest hardships anticipated/mentioned)
Mahābhārata: vana-vāsa hardships of the Pāṇḍavas (general parallel); Purāṇic/Itihāsa motif: reversal from royal luxury to forest austerity
Ayodhyākāṇḍa: repeated palace-vs-forest contrasts in Kaushalya/Sumitrā/Lakṣmaṇa dialogues
Anuṣṭup (śloka)
Grieving
Mandra-pradhāna with gentle kampita on kaṣāya/tikta/kaṭuka for pathos
FAQs
The verse contrasts comfort and austerity to show the moral weight of decisions: dharma requires that power be exercised with empathy and restraint, not cruelty through policy.
Daśaratha mourns the loss of Rāma’s royal nourishment and imagines him forced to subsist on harsh forest foods.
Rāma’s implied endurance and capacity for renunciation (even if not stated directly), set against Daśaratha’s grief-driven compassion.
Ask anything about this verse
Answers come straight from the texts, with the shlokas they draw on. Ask in your own words.
A free sign-in with Google or Apple keeps your chat saved across web and the app.
Read Valmiki Ramayana in the Vedapath app
Scan the QR code to open this directly in the app, with word-by-word meanings, Sanskrit recitation where available, and more.
