Shloka 38
Śikṣā-nirūpaṇa (Exposition of Discipline): Son’s Marriage, Paternal Duty, and Royal Administration
विष्णुं परित्यज्य वरं सुराणां संपूजयेद्योऽन्यतमं हि देवम् । गच्छेत्सगर्भां युवतीं प्रसूतां दंड्यश्च वध्यश्च स चास्मदीयैः ॥ ३८ ॥
viṣṇuṃ parityajya varaṃ surāṇāṃ saṃpūjayedyo'nyatamaṃ hi devam | gacchetsagarbhāṃ yuvatīṃ prasūtāṃ daṃḍyaśca vadhyaśca sa cāsmadīyaiḥ || 38 ||
ദേവന്മാരിൽ ശ്രേഷ്ഠനായ വിഷ്ണുവിനെ ഉപേക്ഷിച്ച് മറ്റേതെങ്കിലും ദേവനെ പൂജിക്കുന്നവൻ—ഞങ്ങളുടെ രാജാധികാരികൾ ശിക്ഷിക്കേണ്ടവൻ, ആവശ്യമെങ്കിൽ വധ്യനും. ഗർഭിണിയെയോ പ്രസവിച്ച യുവതിയെയോ സമീപിക്കുന്നത് എങ്ങനെ കുറ്റമോ അതുപോലെ.
Narada (teaching in a dharma-śāstric tone within Uttara-Bhaga narration)
Vrata: none
Rasa: {"primary_rasa":"raudra","secondary_rasa":"bhayanaka","emotional_journey":"A fierce sectarian-legal warning escalates to capital punishment, reinforced by an analogy to a grave sexual transgression."}
FAQs
It asserts Viṣṇu’s supremacy and frames abandoning Him for other worship as a grave adharma, emphasizing exclusive, steadfast devotion as spiritually and socially consequential.
Bhakti here is presented as niṣṭhā (single-pointed fidelity) to Viṣṇu; shifting devotion away from Him is condemned as a serious breach, underscoring commitment as the core of Vaiṣṇava practice.
Rather than a Vedāṅga technicality, the verse reflects rāja-dharma and smṛti-style legal reasoning—using a strong moral analogy to define a punishable offense and deter transgressive conduct.