HomeBhagavad GitaCh. 10Shloka 15
Previous Verse
Next Verse

Bhagavad Gita — Vibhuti Yoga, Shloka 15

Vibhuti Yoga

Bhagavad Gita 15 illustration

स्वयमेवात्मनात्मानं वेत्थ त्वं पुरुषोत्तम । भूतभावन भूतेश देवदेव जगत्पते ॥ १०.१५ ॥

svayam evātmanātmānaṁ vettha tvaṁ puruṣottama | bhūtabhāvana bhūteśa devadeva jagatpate || 10.15 ||

പുരുഷോത്തമനേ, നീ സ്വയം തന്നാൽ തന്നെ നിന്നെ അറിയുന്നു. ഭൂതങ്ങളെ ഉത്ഭവിപ്പിക്കുന്നവനേ, ഭൂതേശനേ, ദേവദേവനേ, ജഗത്പതേ.

You alone know Yourself by Yourself, O Supreme Person; O originator of beings, Lord of beings, God of gods, ruler of the world.

You yourself know yourself by yourself, Supreme Person—creator/nurturer of beings, lord of beings, god of gods, lord of the world.

The verse is stable; interpretive nuance lies in bhūta-bhāvana (either ‘source’ or ‘nurturer’ of beings) and in reading the line as asserting divine self-knowledge as unique and unsurpassable.

स्वयम्by oneself; personally
स्वयम्:
Rootस्वयम्
एवindeed; alone; only
एव:
Rootएव
आत्मनाby (your) Self
आत्मना:
Karana
Rootआत्मन्
आत्मानम्yourself; the Self (as object of knowing)
आत्मानम्:
Karma
Rootआत्मन्
वेत्थyou know
वेत्थ:
Root√विद् (विद्/वेद)
त्वम्you
त्वम्:
Karta
Rootयुष्मद्
पुरुषोत्तमO Supreme Person
पुरुषोत्तम:
Rootपुरुषोत्तम
भूतभावनO nourisher/creator of beings
भूतभावन:
Rootभूतभावन
भूतेशO Lord of beings
भूतेश:
Rootभूतेश
देवदेवO God of gods
देवदेव:
Rootदेवदेव
जगत्पतेO Lord of the universe
जगत्पते:
Rootजगत्पति
Arjuna
PuruṣottamaĪśvaraSvayam-prakāśatva (self-luminosity/self-revelation)
Divine sovereigntyUniqueness of divine self-knowledgeCosmic lordship

FAQs

The verse contrasts finite self-understanding (often partial and mediated) with an ideal of complete self-knowledge, which can serve as a regulative ideal for self-inquiry.

It asserts the divine as self-grounded and self-knowing, not dependent on external validation—an important theistic claim about ultimate reality’s independence.

Arjuna emphasizes that only Krishna can fully disclose Krishna’s nature, justifying his request for further teaching on divine manifestations.

It supports the practice of intellectual humility: recognizing that some domains require guidance from more comprehensive standpoints (teachers, traditions, or disciplined methods) rather than speculation alone.