HomeBhagavad GitaCh. 18Shloka 59
Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 59

Moksha Sannyasa YogaMoksha Sannyasa Yoga

Bhagavad Gita 59 illustration

यदहंकारमाश्रित्य न योत्स्य इति मन्यसे । मिथ्यैष व्यवसायस्ते प्रकृतिस्त्वां नियोक्ष्यति ॥ १८.५९ ॥

yad ahaṅkāram āśritya na yotsya iti manyase | mithyaiṣa vyavasāyas te prakṛtis tvāṁ niyokṣyati || 18.59 ||

അഹങ്കാരത്തെ ആശ്രയിച്ച് ‘ഞാൻ യുദ്ധം ചെയ്യില്ല’ എന്ന് നീ കരുതുന്നുവെങ്കിൽ, ആ നിശ്ചയം വ്യർത്ഥമാണ്; നിന്റെ പ്രകൃതി നിന്നെ കര്‍മത്തിലേക്ക് തന്നെ നിയോഗിക്കും.

यदि तुम अहंकार का आश्रय लेकर यह मानते हो कि ‘मैं युद्ध नहीं करूँगा’, तो तुम्हारा यह निश्चय मिथ्या है; तुम्हारी प्रकृति तुम्हें कर्म में लगा देगी।

If, relying on egoism, you think ‘I will not engage in battle/action,’ this resolve of yours is mistaken; your nature will compel you into action.

‘योत्स्य’ historically refers to fighting in the epic setting, but many interpreters generalize it to ‘undertaking one’s duty-bound action.’ ‘प्रकृति’ is read either as one’s psycho-physical constitution shaped by guṇas and past habituation, or as the broader cosmic nature; both support the idea of compulsion through conditioned tendencies.

यत्that which / because (that)
यत्:
Rootयद्
अहंकारम्ego-sense, ‘I’-notion
अहंकारम्:
Karma
Rootअहंकार
आश्रित्यhaving resorted to, relying on
आश्रित्य:
Rootआ-श्रि (√श्रि)
not
:
Root
योत्स्येI shall fight
योत्स्ये:
Rootयुध् (√युध्)
इतिthus (thinking/saying)
इति:
Rootइति
मन्यसेyou think, you suppose
मन्यसे:
Rootमन् (√मन्)
मिथ्याfalsely, in vain
मिथ्या:
Rootमिथ्या
एषःthis
एषः:
Rootएतद्
व्यवसायःresolve, determination, decision
व्यवसायः:
Karta
Rootव्यवसाय
तेyour
ते:
Rootयुष्मद्
प्रकृतिःnature, one’s constitutive nature
प्रकृतिः:
Karta
Rootप्रकृति
त्वाम्you
त्वाम्:
Karma
Rootयुष्मद्
नियोक्ष्यतिwill compel, will yoke/drive (you)
नियोक्ष्यति:
Rootनि-युज् (√युज्)
KrishnaArjuna
PrakṛtiGuṇasAhaṅkāraKarma (action and disposition)
Limits of ego-based choiceConditioned agencyDuty versus avoidance

FAQs

The verse anticipates a conflict between conscious intention and ingrained disposition: even if one declares avoidance, habitual patterns and temperament can override stated plans, especially when the intention is motivated by ego-reactivity.

It implies that embodied agency is constrained by prakṛti (guṇa-conditioned nature). Genuine freedom is associated with insight that loosens identification with ego and conditioned impulses.

Krishna addresses Arjuna’s earlier reluctance by arguing that refusal is unstable if it contradicts Arjuna’s own warrior-social role and temperament within the epic framework.

It can be applied to behavior change: commitments that ignore deep conditioning often fail; sustainable change requires working with one’s dispositions through training, reflection, and supportive structures.