Shloka 33
नारद–असित (देवल) संवादः — भूतप्रभवाप्यय, इन्द्रिय-गुण-विवेक, क्षेत्रज्ञ-तत्त्व
यज्ञशास्त्रमें क्रमश: वर्णित ये सम्पूर्ण यज्ञांग विधि-पूर्वक यज्ञमें प्रयुक्त हो एक दूसरेको धारण करते हैं ।।
āmnāyam ārṣaṁ paśyāmi yasmin vedāḥ pratiṣṭhitāḥ | taṁ vidvāṁso 'nupaśyanti brāhmaṇasyānudarśanāt ||
ກະປິລາກ່າວວ່າ: «ຂ້ອຍເຫັນປະເພນີໂບຮານທີ່ຖືກຮຽບຮຽງໂດຍພວກລະສີ (āmnāya) ອັນເປັນທີ່ຕັ້ງມັ່ນຂອງພຣະເວດ. ເນື່ອງຈາກມັນຖືກຢືນຢັນໂດຍພາກບຣາຫມະນະ (Brahmana) ອັນເປັນອໍານາດນໍາພາການກະທໍາພິທີ, ບັນດາຜູ້ຮູ້ຈຶ່ງຍອມຮັບຄໍາສອນຂອງລະສີນັ້ນເປັນມາດຕະຖານອັນຖືກຕ້ອງ».
कपिल उवाच
Educational Q&A
Kapila affirms a hierarchy of scriptural authority: the seer-transmitted tradition (āmnāya) is trustworthy because the Vedas are grounded in it and because it is corroborated by the Brāhmaṇa portions that prescribe and explain ritual action; thus the learned accept it as pramāṇa (a valid standard).
In the didactic setting of Śānti Parva, Kapila is explaining how wise people determine what counts as authoritative dharma/ritual teaching, pointing to the continuity between Veda, Brāhmaṇa guidance, and the received seerly tradition.