Shloka 23
Go-apahāra (Cattle Theft), Go-dāna (Cow-Gift), and Suvarṇa-dakṣiṇā (Gold Fee): Karmic Consequence and Purificatory Merit
रक्षितास्मीति चोक्तं ते प्रतिज्ञा चानृता तव । ब्राह्मणस्वस्य चादानं द्विविधस्ते व्यतिक्रम:
rakṣitāsmīti coktaṃ te pratijñā cānṛtā tava | brāhmaṇasvasya cādānaṃ dvividhās te vyatikramaḥ ||
“ທ່ານເຄີຍກ່າວວ່າ ‘ຂ້ອຍເປັນຜູ້ຄຸ້ມຄອງພວກເຈົ້າ’ ແຕ່ຄໍາປະຕິຍານັ້ນກັບກາຍເປັນບໍ່ຈິງ ເພາະງົວຂອງພຣາຫມັນໄດ້ສູນຫາຍ. ອີກທັງ ທ່ານໄດ້ເອົາຊັບຂອງພຣາຫມັນ—ແມ່ນແຕ່ໂດຍຄວາມຜິດພາດກໍຕາມ. ດັ່ງນັ້ນ ທ່ານໄດ້ລ່ວງລະເມີດສອງປະການ: ການບໍ່ອາດຮັກສາຕາມຄໍາສັນຍາ ແລະ ການຍຶດຊັບພຣາຫມັນຢ່າງບໍ່ຖືກທຳ.”
ब्राह्मण उवाच
Educational Q&A
A ruler’s dharma is measured by protection and integrity: proclaiming oneself a protector creates a binding obligation, and failure to safeguard the vulnerable makes the pledge ‘false’ in effect. Additionally, Brahmin property is treated as especially inviolable; even inadvertent taking is a serious breach. The verse frames wrongdoing as twofold—broken protective duty and wrongful appropriation.
A Brahmin addresses a ruler/authority figure, accusing him of two offenses: his public assurance of protection has been undermined because a Brahmin’s cow was lost, and he has also taken the Brahmin’s wealth (even if by mistake). The speech functions as a moral indictment, pressing accountability under dharma.