Devaśarmā–Vipula Dialogue on Ahorātra–Ṛtu as Moral Witnesses (अनुशासन पर्व, अध्याय ४३)
निर्मुक्तस्य रजोरूपान्नापराधो भवेन्मम | यथा हि शून्यां पथिक: सभामध्यावसेत् पथि
nirmuktasya rajorūpān nāparādho bhaven mama | yathā hi śūnyāṃ pathikaḥ sabhāmadhyāvased pathi |
ພີສະມະ ກ່າວວ່າ: «ເນື່ອງຈາກຂ້າພະເຈົ້າພົ້ນຈາກຮູບແບບແຫ່ງຣາຊະສ (ຄວາມຫົວໃຈຮ້ອນ ແລະ ຄວາມກະສົນ) ແລ້ວ ຄວາມຜິດຈຶ່ງບໍ່ອາດຕົກແກ່ຂ້າພະເຈົ້າ. ເຫມືອນນັກເດີນທາງທີ່ພັກຢູ່ໂຮງພັກທີ່ວ່າງເປົ່າຂ້າງທາງໂດຍບໍ່ຍຶດຕິດ ຂ້າພະເຈົ້າກໍຈະເຂົ້າໄປ ແລະ ພັກຢູ່ໃນກາຍຂອງພັນລະຍາຄູອາຈານ ດ້ວຍຄວາມລະວັງ—ໃຫ້ການຢູ່ຂອງຂ້າພະເຈົ້າທີ່ນັ້ນເປັນໄປໄດ້»
भीष्म उवाच
Freedom from rajas (passionate agitation) is presented as a safeguard against ethical fault: when action is undertaken without desire, possessiveness, or self-serving impulse, it is less likely to generate culpability. The verse uses an analogy of a traveler resting briefly in an empty place to illustrate non-attachment and temporary, duty-bound presence.
Bhishma explains his intention to enter and reside in another’s body—specifically the guru’s wife—while claiming inner detachment and vigilance. He frames this extraordinary act as ethically non-culpable due to his freedom from rajas, likening it to a traveler taking temporary shelter without ownership or attachment.