Mahabharata 1.74.98 — Adi Parva, Adhyaya 74, Shloka 98
अध्याय ७४: अक्रोध–क्षमा–निवासनीति
Chapter 74: Non-anger, Forbearance, and the Ethics of Residence
कुलवंशप्रतिष्ठां हि पितर: पुत्रमब्रुवन् । उत्तमं सर्वधर्माणां तस्मात् पुत्र न संत्यजेत्
kula-vaṁśa-pratiṣṭhāṁ hi pitaraḥ putram abruvan | uttamaṁ sarva-dharmāṇāṁ tasmāt putra na saṁtyajet ||
ດຸສະຍັນຕະ ກ່າວວ່າ: «ບັນພະບຸລຸດໄດ້ກ່າວໄວ້ວ່າ ບຸດແມ່ນຖານຮາກຂອງຕະກູນ ແລະສາຍເຊື້ອ. ດັ່ງນັ້ນ ໃນທຳທັງປວງ ທຳທີ່ເກືອບກັບການມີແລະອຸປະຖຳບຸດແມ່ນສູງສຸດ; ເພາະສະນັ້ນ ບໍ່ຄວນທິ້ງບຸດ».
दुष्यन्त उवाच
Educational Q&A
The verse teaches that preserving family and lineage is a major ethical duty, and that a son is traditionally regarded as central to that continuity; therefore abandoning one’s son is presented as contrary to dharma.
Duṣyanta is arguing from ancestral authority and social-religious norms, emphasizing that the forefathers value a son as the support of family and lineage, and using this to justify the injunction not to give up the son.
Ask anything about this verse
Curious about the meaning, context, or a word? Ask, and continue the conversation in the Vedapath app.
A free Google sign-in keeps your chat saved across web and the app.
Read Mahabharata in the Vedapath app
Scan the QR code to open this directly in the app, with audio, word-by-word meanings, and more.