Vamana's Three Steps — Binding of Bali
या नैव शक्य भवता हि पूरितुं कथं वितन्याद् दितिजेश्वरो ऽसौ शक्तस्तु संपूजयितुं मुरारे प्रसीद मा बन्धनमादिशस्व
yā naiva śakya bhavatā hi pūrituṃ kathaṃ vitanyād ditijeśvaro 'sau śaktastu saṃpūjayituṃ murāre prasīda mā bandhanamādiśasva
ನೀನು ಕೂಡ ಸಂಪೂರ್ಣವಾಗಿ ತುಂಬಲಾರದ ಆ ದಾನವನ್ನು ದಿತಿಜಾಧಿಪತಿ (ಬಲಿ) ಹೇಗೆ ವಿಸ್ತರಿಸಬಲ್ಲನು? ಆದರೂ, ಹೇ ಮುರಾರೇ, ಅವನು ನಿನ್ನನ್ನು ಸಮ್ಯಕ್ ಪೂಜಿಸಲು ಸಮರ್ಥನು. ಪ್ರಸನ್ನನಾಗು; ಅವನ ಬಂಧನವನ್ನು ಆಜ್ಞಾಪಿಸಬೇಡ.
{ "primaryRasa": "karuna", "secondaryRasa": "shanta", "rasaIntensity": 0, "emotionalArcPosition": "", "moodDescriptors": [] }
The line is rhetorical: the ‘measure’ becomes infinite once Trivikrama expands. Bāṇa argues that the promise is structurally impossible for any finite donor, thus binding Bali appears unjust from a contractual standpoint.
He shifts the criterion from quantitative land to qualitative devotion: Bali can ‘saṃpūjayituṃ’—honor and worship the Lord—implying that sincere reverence should satisfy the spirit of dāna.
It refers to Bali’s restraint/punishment for failing to complete the promised gift, a narrative device that simultaneously tests truthfulness, curbs royal pride, and elevates Bali as an exemplar of steadfast vow-keeping.