Shloka 13
राजधर्मः, दण्डनीतिः, कर्तृत्व-विचारः च
Royal Duty, Lawful Discipline, and the Question of Agency
ईश्वरेण नियुक्तो हि साध्वसाधु च भारत । कुरुते पुरुष: कर्म फलमीश्वरगामि तत्
īśvareṇa niyukto hi sādhv-asādhu ca bhārata | kurute puruṣaḥ karma phalam īśvara-gāmi tat ||
វ្យាសៈបានមានព្រះវាចាថា៖ «ឱ ភារតៈ បើទទួលថា ព្រះអម្ចាស់ជាអ្នកជំរុញ និងជាអ្នកធ្វើ នោះមនុស្សធ្វើទាំងកម្មល្អ និងកម្មអាក្រក់ ដោយការជំរុញរបស់ព្រះអម្ចាស់តែប៉ុណ្ណោះ; ហើយក្នុងករណីនោះ ផលនៃកម្មទាំងនោះគួរតែទៅដល់ព្រះអម្ចាស់ឯង»។
व्यास उवाच
Educational Q&A
The verse argues that if God is taken as the direct instigator of human actions, then moral agency shifts away from the person; consequently, the results (phala) of both good and evil deeds would logically belong to God. This is a critique of attributing all human action to divine compulsion, and it implicitly defends human responsibility in karma.
In the Śānti Parva’s reflective discourse on dharma and conduct, Vyāsa presents a philosophical point to the addressed Bhārata: he frames a logical consequence of the claim that God is the doer/impeller of human deeds, highlighting the ethical problem that would follow regarding ownership of karmic results.