Shloka 3
Atithi-prāpti and the Brāhmaṇa’s Deliberation on Triadic Dharma (अतिथिप्राप्तिः धर्मत्रयविचारश्च)
कथं प्रवृत्तिधर्मेषु भागा्हा देवता: कृता: । कथं निवृत्तिधर्माश्व कृता व्यावृत्तबुद्धयः
kathaṁ pravṛttidharmeṣu bhāgāḥ devatāḥ kṛtāḥ | kathaṁ nivṛttidharmeṣu ca kṛtā vyāvṛttabuddhayaḥ ||
シャウナカは問うた。「いかにして神々は、祭祀をはじめとする儀礼行為など、世に関わる実践の法（プラヴリッティのダルマ）において分け前を与えられ、参与する者と定められたのか。しかるに一方で、仙聖たちはいかにして、感官の対象から心を背け、出離・捨離の法（ニヴリッティのダルマ）に安住する者とされたのか。何ゆえにこの区分が設けられたのか。」
शौनक उवाच
Educational Q&A
The verse frames a foundational dharma-question: why the cosmos is organized with different beings aligned to different paths—deities oriented to ritual participation and receipt of offerings (pravṛtti), and sages oriented to detachment and renunciation (nivṛtti). It invites an explanation of complementary roles: sustaining worldly order through action and pointing beyond it through renunciation.
Śaunaka, in a dialogic setting, asks for the rationale behind the allocation of roles: why gods are made beneficiaries/participants in sacrificial action, and why sages are fashioned with withdrawn minds devoted to renunciant discipline. The question sets up a response about the origin and purpose of these two dharma-orientations.