Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 61

Śuka’s Guṇa-Transcendence and Vyāsa’s Consolation (शुकगति-वर्णनम्)

आप मोक्षधर्म (संन्यास-आश्रम)-के अनुसार बर्ताव करती हैं और मैं गृहस्थ-आश्रममें स्थित हूँ; अत: आपके द्वारा यह दूसरा आश्रमसंकर नामक दोषका उत्पादन किया जा रहा है, जो अत्यन्त कष्ट प्रद है ।।

sagotrāṁ vāsagotrāṁ vā na veda tvāṁ na vettha mām | sagotram āviśantyās te tṛtīyo gotrasaṅkaraḥ ||

汝は解脱の法(出家の道のごとき)に従って振る舞い、我は家住のアーシュラマにある。ゆえに汝によって第二の過失—アーシュラマ・サンカラ(住期の混淆)—が生じ、きわめて苦しきものとなる。さらに、汝が我と同じゴートラ(氏族)に属するのか、あるいはゴートラを持たぬのか、我は知らぬ。汝もまた我を知らぬ。ゆえに、同じ氏族であるやもしれぬ我と結びに入ったことで、汝は第三の混乱—ゴートラ・サンカラ(氏族の混淆)—という重い過失を生じさせたのだ。

सगोत्राम्a woman of the same gotra
सगोत्राम्:
Karma
TypeAdjective
Rootसगोत्रा
FormFeminine, Accusative, Singular
वाor
वा:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootवा
असगोत्राम्a woman not of the same gotra
असगोत्राम्:
Karma
TypeAdjective
Rootअसगोत्रा
FormFeminine, Accusative, Singular
वाor
वा:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootवा
not
:
TypeIndeclinable
Root
वेदknows
वेद:
TypeVerb
Rootविद्
FormPerfect (Paroksha), 3rd, Singular, Parasmaipada
त्वाम्you
त्वाम्:
Karma
TypePronoun
Rootत्वद्
FormCommon, Accusative, Singular
not
:
TypeIndeclinable
Root
वेत्थyou know
वेत्थ:
TypeVerb
Rootविद्
FormPerfect (Paroksha), 2nd, Singular, Parasmaipada
माम्me
माम्:
Karma
TypePronoun
Rootअस्मद्
FormCommon, Accusative, Singular
सगोत्रम्one of the same gotra (me)
सगोत्रम्:
Karma
TypeAdjective
Rootसगोत्र
FormMasculine, Accusative, Singular
आविशन्तीentering
आविशन्ती:
Karta
TypeVerb
Rootआ-विश्
FormFeminine, Nominative, Singular, Shatr (present active participle)
अस्तेremains / is
अस्ते:
TypeVerb
Rootआस्
FormPresent, 3rd, Singular, Atmanepada
तृतीयःthird
तृतीयः:
TypeAdjective
Rootतृतीय
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
गोत्रसंकरःconfusion/mixing of gotras
गोत्रसंकरः:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootगोत्रसंकर
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular

जनक उवाच

J
Janaka

Educational Q&A

The verse frames ethical anxiety around uncertain lineage: without knowing each other’s gotra, entering a relationship risks ‘gotra-saṅkara’—a socially and ritually serious transgression in dharma discourse. It highlights the dharmic emphasis on clarity of social identity and the perceived consequences of violating lineage boundaries.

Janaka addresses a woman (contextually connected with discussions of mokṣa-dharma and āśrama duties) and argues that because neither knows the other’s gotra, her entering into union with him may constitute same-gotra association, producing a ‘third’ kind of gotra-confusion fault.