Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 37

कपिल–स्यूमरश्मि संवादः

Kapila and Syūmaraśmi on Renunciation, Householder Support, and Epistemic Authority

ये च च्छिन्दन्ति वृषणान्‌ ये च भिन्दन्ति नस्तकान्‌ | वहन्ति महतो भारान्‌ बध्नन्ति दमयन्ति च

ye ca cchindanti vṛṣaṇān ye ca bhindanti nastakān | vahanti mahato bhārān badhnanti damayanti ca ||

トゥラーダーラは言った。「また、牡牛を去勢し、鼻を穿ち、重い荷を負わせ、縛りつけて屈服させ、働かせる者たちを、なぜおまえは非難しないのか。同じく、多くの生きものを殺して食らう者たち、そして人でありながら人を奴隷として使い、その労苦の実りを自ら享受する者たちを、なぜ咎めないのか。」

येwho (those who)
ये:
Karta
TypePronoun
Rootयद्
FormMasculine, Nominative, Plural
and
:
TypeIndeclinable
Root
च्छिन्दन्तिcut
च्छिन्दन्ति:
TypeVerb
Rootछिद्
FormPresent (Lat), Third, Plural, Parasmaipada
वृषणान्testicles
वृषणान्:
Karma
TypeNoun
Rootवृषण
FormMasculine, Accusative, Plural
येwho (those who)
ये:
Karta
TypePronoun
Rootयद्
FormMasculine, Nominative, Plural
and
:
TypeIndeclinable
Root
भिन्दन्तिsplit, break
भिन्दन्ति:
TypeVerb
Rootभिद्
FormPresent (Lat), Third, Plural, Parasmaipada
नस्तकान्nostrils/noses
नस्तकान्:
Karma
TypeNoun
Rootनस्तक
FormMasculine, Accusative, Plural
वहन्तिcarry, bear
वहन्ति:
TypeVerb
Rootवह्
FormPresent (Lat), Third, Plural, Parasmaipada
महतःof great (heavy)
महतः:
TypeAdjective
Rootमहत्
FormMasculine/Neuter, Genitive, Singular
भारान्burdens, loads
भारान्:
Karma
TypeNoun
Rootभार
FormMasculine, Accusative, Plural
बध्नन्तिbind, tie
बध्नन्ति:
TypeVerb
Rootबन्ध्
FormPresent (Lat), Third, Plural, Parasmaipada
दमयन्तिtame, subdue
दमयन्ति:
TypeVerb
Rootदम्
FormCausative Present (Lat, ṇic), Third, Plural, Parasmaipada
and
:
TypeIndeclinable
Root

तुलाधार उवाच

T
Tulādhāra
B
bulls (cattle)

Educational Q&A

Tulādhāra presses for moral consistency: if one condemns certain forms of harm, one must also recognize and condemn socially normalized harms—cruelty to animals through mutilation and forced labor, killing for food, and human exploitation through enslavement and appropriation of others’ labor.

In the Tulādhāra episode of Śānti Parva, Tulādhāra responds to a moral critic by pointing to everyday, accepted practices of violence and domination. He challenges selective outrage and redirects the discussion toward a broader, more impartial standard of dharma grounded in non-injury and fairness.